I started this post with data and begging that any reader considering not getting the flu shot run out and get it. Instead I've moved that information to the bottom of the post to make sure that you get to the fun part first. I'll ask that you read the last few paragraphs, but if you don't I'll understand. Especially if you've gotten your flu shot or at least plan to.
If you do want some facts there's a ton out there and here, let me help you find it. (click that one - it's fun). What I would like to know is what is behind the extreme aversion to the shot. I understand that having a needle stuck in your arm isn't fun and you aren't quite sure what's in it, which can be unnerving. But if you think that the government or big pharma is going to poison you a) you're possibly insane, b) you have delusions of grand-importance and c) you need to ask yourself WHY. Unless you're a spy and Vladimir Putin is after you the odds are pretty good that both the government and the drug companies want you very much alive. I mean, you're not going to pay taxes or buy medication if you're dead, right? Check your paranoia at the door, thankyouverymuch. There's no sensible reason, whatsoever, for anyone to want you dead. Except maybe your ex. Check into that.
And if you're not sure what's in the vaccine or how it works as your doctor. What? You don't have a doctor? Oh, yeah, I forgot - we haven't passed health care reform yet, but that's a rant for another time. No doctor? Check out the CDC's, the NIH's, any major medical school's web site, etc. Or ask me - I'll be happy to help. Seriously, I know a lot about this stuff. If you're worried about catching the flu from the vaccine rest assured: you can't because it isn't possible. Unfortunately some of the side-effects of the vaccine seem to be a minor strain of the flu: muscle aches, low-grade fever, congestion. But side-effects are generally far milder, they're not contagious and, oh yeah, they won't KILL you.
What makes me the most angry is people I've thought were perfectly reasonable jumping on the anti-vaccine bandwagon: celebrities, actors, talk-show hosts who otherwise seem to have their wits about them. Yet they start talking about vaccines and their conspiracy loon sides come out. Several celebs I (guiltily) follow on Twitter asked their collective followings whether they should get the flu vaccine and in each case they've said that more people told them not to than told them to. And here I thought twits were some of the brighter electrons on-line - WRONG. Even worse, last week I heard Bill Maher, with whom I often agree, rant about how vaccines have done nothing useful but perpetuate the vaccine industry. Really? Do you have Polio? Small pox? Can you find a vaccinated child under 18 who has had the chicken pox? Know anyone with Measles? Mumps? Rubella? Diptheria? I could go on. Vaccines are probably second only to antibiotics as the biggest medical miracle of the 20th century. And these fools are wondering whether to get the shot? Really??
Fine, don't get it, Mr Famousguy. Play Russian Roulette with your own life. But for safety's sake don't encourage your impressionable listeners/watchers/readers to do the same. The odds are good that you have adequate health care being rich and/or famous. Your sheep aren't all so lucky. Think of it this way: if they die or get sick because you told them to avoid the shot you lose ratings, ad sales, readers, etc. How 'bout them apples?
Ultimately I think this comes down to education and rabid gullibility. But that, too, is another blog post. Watch for it here soon.
Rabid anti-vaxxers: Absurdly dangerous and really stupid.
-------------- Bonus material ---------------
With the onset of flu season soon there has been a lot of talk in the news about both the routine, seasonal flu and of course H1N1 swine flu, and whether or not to get vaccinated. There have been stories about people dying from the flu and others about people being hurt by the vaccine. What should you do? Well, I'm not a doctor (nor have I ever played one on TV) so I suggest you check reputable sources like doctors and medical researchers and, you know, scientists. Your new age guru might know the best Yanni tracks and incense but he doesn't know squat about microbiology and the only thing his herbs will protect is the fatness of his wallet. But since you're reading here anyway how about some facts before we get to the good stuff: sarcasm, opinion and some funnies. I don't normally get so serious, but this is, literally, a life-and-death issue.
30,000 people die every year from the seasonal flu, most of whom have weakened immune systems due to other illness or age. Children over 2 are typically spared, though they do go through a week or two of hell. H1N1, on the other hand, impacts 10-45 year-olds (Times of India) much more than the seasonal flu. In fact, as of the middle of October more children in the United States under 12 have died from H1N1 than die from conventional flu in an average year. And flu season hasn't really started yet.
Many news outlets in the DC area (for example) reported a story about a Washington Redskins cheerleader, Desuree Jennings, who came down with what some doctors think may be distonia and which has been reported to be a rare reaction to the flu vaccine. Did you catch all of the qualifiers there? If not let me add another: medical experts are almost unanimous in that she does NOT have distonia and even if she does it is NOT linked to the flu shot.
Just for a second let's take the media reports as truth and assume (against all medical evidence) that it was a reaction to the flu shot and the 1:1,000,000 odds that have been pulled out of thin air are accurate. While the story is tragic, what's even more tragic is that 36,000 Americans die every year from the seasonal flu. So let's say every one of the 310,000,000 Americans gets the shot and one in a million gets Distonia. That's 310 people with a nasty but not fatal disease, but 36,000 people still alive who would otherwise be dead. Over 100 times more people are saved from dying than are harmed. Those are good odds any way you look at it. Never mind all of the discomfort, pain, lost work, lost productivity, lost money, cold remedies, blankets, tissues, etc that you go through when you have the flu.
What's even better is that real medical experts are highly skeptical that Ms Jenning's illness is related to the flu shot especially since there are no other documented cases of people getting Distonia that way. 0. None. So what I've presented is the worst-possible case scenario which is almost certainly wildly divorced from reality. Do you feel a bit better about it now?
As a counter one news report I present another from the New York Times. A 27-year-old Florida woman came down with H1N1 while pregnant and, tragically, lost her baby because of it and had to spend four months in the hospital, five weeks of which were in a coma. It's true that the H1N1 vaccine wasn't out in time to save her baby, but those of you who are pregnant and are considering avoiding the vaccine read the linked story now. Pregnant women are at the top of the list for who gets the H1N1 vaccine. Please tell me you have an OB. Good. Now call to find out when the shot is coming in, then get it. You don't have to thank me. Just live.
Absurdity is obvious and everywhere. I like to be the fool pointing it out. If you disagree with anything you read here please leave a comment. I hate being wrong so corrections are a way to go from wrong to right. Convince me!
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Dr. Blackbeard, I presume?
On Monday, Price Waterhouse Cooper published an analysis of the Baucus health care reform bill which concluded that insurance premiums were almost certainly going to go up if the bill is signed into law. Later in the day it came to light that the study was commissioned and financed by AHIP, an insurance company lobbying group, calling into serious question the study's findings.
On Tuesday PWC released a statement saying that they were paid to focus on only a small part of the bill and that sections they didn't review could offset "some" of their findings. In other words they cherry picked data to make reform look bad, while threatening Americans with steep insurance rate hikes. (How is this different than what we've seen year in and year out?) Some analysis.
Let me see if I have this straight: The governments wants to regulate the insurance companies who, through a (formerly respectable) mouthpiece, say that rates are going to go up if the bill passes. Did I miss anything?
How is that not blackmail? The insurance industry is threatening to hold their customers hostage if the government does anything to limit their ability to continue to hold us hostage as they have been for decades. Insurance companies add no value to health care other than to suck away 30% of our money as overhead and profit yet they maintain a strangle-hold on almost all of the GOP and much of the Democratic party. They take on no risk of their own but make a huge profit by denying care to sick people.
They're not businesspeople. They're pirates.
No, they're worse than pirates. At least you can negotiate with pirates and they generally don't want to kill you, they just use your death as leverage Insurance companies use death as a business plan.
I don't even know what to call the insurance lobby other than assuredly absurd.
On Tuesday PWC released a statement saying that they were paid to focus on only a small part of the bill and that sections they didn't review could offset "some" of their findings. In other words they cherry picked data to make reform look bad, while threatening Americans with steep insurance rate hikes. (How is this different than what we've seen year in and year out?) Some analysis.
Let me see if I have this straight: The governments wants to regulate the insurance companies who, through a (formerly respectable) mouthpiece, say that rates are going to go up if the bill passes. Did I miss anything?
How is that not blackmail? The insurance industry is threatening to hold their customers hostage if the government does anything to limit their ability to continue to hold us hostage as they have been for decades. Insurance companies add no value to health care other than to suck away 30% of our money as overhead and profit yet they maintain a strangle-hold on almost all of the GOP and much of the Democratic party. They take on no risk of their own but make a huge profit by denying care to sick people.
They're not businesspeople. They're pirates.
No, they're worse than pirates. At least you can negotiate with pirates and they generally don't want to kill you, they just use your death as leverage Insurance companies use death as a business plan.
I don't even know what to call the insurance lobby other than assuredly absurd.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Joe is the new Wayne
Tonight a bit of a diversion from the usual absurdity for a bit of mild silliness.
Do you remember when the middle name "Wayne" was the kiss of death for anyone other than Kenny Wayne Shepherd? Do the names John Wayne Gacy and John Wayne Bobbitt ring any bells? I thought so. If you're interested, by the way, News Of The Weird compiled a much more exhaustive list of middle-name-Waynes (MNW's).
I haven't heard of any MNW's making news lately, but a new name may be replacing it: Joe. One of the stars of John McCain's spectacular flame-out last year was a buffoon they picked up on a campaign stop who was quickly dubbed Joe The Plumber. (Yes, I know it was Barack Obama who found him first, but that isn't important,as it was the GOP that made him a celebrity). Well, Joe isn't his first name (and neither is he a plumber.) His given name is Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher. So, no big deal, right?
Well, as I'm sure all of you know David Letterman was recently the attempted victim of blackmail by a CBS producer, Joe Halderman. But wait, his name is actually Robert Joseph Halderman.
It's not quite the same as the MNW's but there could be a pattern forming. If your middle name is Joseph but you use "Joe" as your first name you may want to rethink that.
Or not. It could just be a coincidence. Either way we'll be watching you MNJ's.
Do you remember when the middle name "Wayne" was the kiss of death for anyone other than Kenny Wayne Shepherd? Do the names John Wayne Gacy and John Wayne Bobbitt ring any bells? I thought so. If you're interested, by the way, News Of The Weird compiled a much more exhaustive list of middle-name-Waynes (MNW's).
I haven't heard of any MNW's making news lately, but a new name may be replacing it: Joe. One of the stars of John McCain's spectacular flame-out last year was a buffoon they picked up on a campaign stop who was quickly dubbed Joe The Plumber. (Yes, I know it was Barack Obama who found him first, but that isn't important,as it was the GOP that made him a celebrity). Well, Joe isn't his first name (and neither is he a plumber.) His given name is Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher. So, no big deal, right?
Well, as I'm sure all of you know David Letterman was recently the attempted victim of blackmail by a CBS producer, Joe Halderman. But wait, his name is actually Robert Joseph Halderman.
It's not quite the same as the MNW's but there could be a pattern forming. If your middle name is Joseph but you use "Joe" as your first name you may want to rethink that.
Or not. It could just be a coincidence. Either way we'll be watching you MNJ's.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
That Jesus guy got it all wrong
Apparently the bible isn't quite conservative enough for some people so now there's a project to re-write it to better exemplify conservative ideals. No, I'm not making this up. See for yourself. They claim that error and liberal bias has crept in via new translations, though the King James version was completed in 1611 so it's only new really by geologic standards. Either there are some very talented liberals out there or someone has a spiffy DeLorean stashed in a garage somewhere waiting for another 1.21gigawatt jolt.
Fundamentalists' need to rewrite history, even arguably fictional history, is astounding. They're not happy unless everything fits perfectly into their restricted world view. I guess it hurts to stretch such a narrow mind, even around their own mythology. It's either black and white or totally incomprehensible. Jesus must be so proud.
Is nothing sacred?
Maybe not, but it is absurd.
Few rational, thinking people would say that the bible is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. In fact, numerous contemporary sources such as the Dead Sea scrolls, throw much of the text into serious doubt, but that hasn't stopped the Church from insisting that it's the sacred, infallible word of God, not to be challenged, doubted or changed. That text has been used over the centuries as an excuse to conquer civilizations, enslave "inferior" races, destroy cultures and kill non-believers. Now they say the extremely popular version, in use for almost four centuries, was wrong and wasn't quite conservative and repressive enough?? Will women be relegated to fourth-class status now?
I'm not going to go through their entire "rationale" though I encourage you to do so. The site only takes a few minutes to read and it will have you laughing and crying within seconds. I will highlight one point to whet your appetite: It claims that the word "comrade" is a "socialistic word" so it must be removed lest tender minds get the inkling that Jesus was a socialist. Never mind that Jesus wanted to heal the sick, feed the hungry and house the poor, which sounds pretty socialistic to me. Maybe they'll tidy that up by instead having him beat the sick, tell the hungry to get a job and kick the poor out of town. (Chuck Noris as Jesus, anyone?) How weak that changes in language threaten the word of their God.
Fundamentalists' need to rewrite history, even arguably fictional history, is astounding. They're not happy unless everything fits perfectly into their restricted world view. I guess it hurts to stretch such a narrow mind, even around their own mythology. It's either black and white or totally incomprehensible. Jesus must be so proud.
Is nothing sacred?
Maybe not, but it is absurd.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)